Legal Opinion
Mattson v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 9, 1948No. Civ. 895PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced .this action to recover damages for the total loss of a scow under a policy of marine insurance. Defendant denies liability to plaintiff, but admits liability to interveners Northern Hardwood Veneers, Inc., herein referred to as Northern, and Aggregates Corporation, herein referred to as Aggregates, for services rendered in salvaging the scow, “Butternut”.
The case was tried to the court. The record is lengthy and many exhibits are in evidence. A summarization of the facts may be helpful.
Plaintiff purchased the scow - from' Northern on May 16, 1947.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Union Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Globe Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Copelin v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Cary v. . Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tropical Marine Products, Inc. v. Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Proprietors Ins. Co. v. SiegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Texaco, Inc. v. Universal Marine, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975
- Ferrante v. Detroit Fire and Marine Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Watson v. Providence Washington Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.