Legal Opinion

Pacific Dredging Co. v. Hurley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1964No. 37099PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting to respondent $26,546.44 in damages on its claim for negligence of appellants, insurance brokers, in failing to extend or renew marine insurance coverage on respondent’s dredge, which sank in Puget Sound.

Respondent, Pacific Dredging Company, Inc., was the owner of a suction dredge, called “Pacific Dredge No. 1.” The dredge was used principally on inland waters around Seattle (Lake Washington, Lake Union, the ship canal, and Duwamish River). Appellants, since 1959, had acted as exclusive insurance brokers for respondent and handled all matters…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hardt v. BrinkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1961
  2. Bates v. Bowles White & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Glens Falls Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. Massey Steamship Co. v. Importers & Exporters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Delanty v. Yang Tsze InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lazzara v. Howard A. Esser, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. SMI Owen Steel Co., Inc. v. Marsh USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. Pete's Satire, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Kenyon v. LarsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Proprietors Ins. Co. v. SiegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API