Legal Opinion

Caplan v. Arndt

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The plaintiff, a pedestrian, was struck by a light truck owned by the named defendant and driven by the other defendant, Kleber, as his agent, while the plaintiff was crossing Dixwell Avenue in New Haven. The plaintiff, in his appeal, seeks to secure numerous corrections in the finding. These corrections, if granted, would result in a finding which would not support the conclusions of the trial court.

There were only two witnesses of the accident, the plaintiff and Kleber. A comparison of their testimony with the facts found discloses that the court did not accept that of either in its…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fine v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  2. Perry v. HaritosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Correnti v. CatinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Puza v. HamwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Russell v. VergasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Morgan v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Corey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
  5. Sisti v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API