Bodell v. General Gas & Electric Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The complainants state their contention in this case under two heads. They are, (a) the practice complained of constitutes a conscious offer of no par value stock below its fair sales value, and, like all such offers is illegal; and (b) even if a conscious offer of no par value stock below its fair sales value may be legal if made to certain persons, it is illegal if made to the A stockholders alone in addition to their quarterly cash dividends of thirty-seven and one-half cents per share and before the B stockholders have received $1.50 per share. No attempt will be made in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Gray v. President of the Portland BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Wall v. Utah Copper Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Finch v. Warrior Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- Sample v. MorganCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Allaun v. Consolidated Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
- Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.