Wall v. Utah Copper Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On order to show cause why injunction should not issue. Heard on bill and. one.affidavit, and one affidavit in opposition thereto.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, Y. C.
The complainant, Wall, a resident of Salt Lake City, Utah,, is a holder of ninety thousand shares (par value, $900,000), being one-fifth of the capital stock of the defendant the Utah Copper Company, a corporation of this state, and is one of the-seven directors thereof, and also vice president thereof.
The defendants, six in number, other than the corporation, are the other directors thereof, and the defendant MacHeill is the president thereof.
On the 11th of September the complainant presented his bill, with one affidavit annexed, the object of which is to restrain *18the issuing by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gray v. President of the Portland BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Jones v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
3Cited by12 opinions
- Elias v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Grimes v. Alteon, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Bodell v. General Gas & Electric Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1926
- Powell v. Maryland Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Borg v. International Silver Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.