Legal Opinion
Finch v. Warrior Cement Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided February 8, 1928PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
These two cases were heard together. The parties complainant, however, sue in entirely different capacities. In one of them the complainants sue as stockholders of Gulf (one of them also claims to be a creditor and sues likewise as such), and in the other the complainant sues as a stockholder of the Warrior Company. The relief asked in the respective suits is of course entirely different. Accordingly I shall in the ensuing opinion treat the two cases as distinct. First then, as to the case of
Finch, et al., v. Warrior Cement Corporation, et al.
In this case the complainants seek…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Lofland v. CahallSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
- Lauman v. Lebanon Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
- Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
- Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Orzeck v. EnglehartSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
- Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.