Legal Opinion
Tirona v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided May 21, 1993No. Civ. 92-00347 BMKPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Alfredo Tirona (“Tirona”) sued under the No-fault and underinsured motorist (“UIM”) provisions of his wife’s insurance policy with defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). Both Tirona and State Farm filed motions for Summary Judgment. On January 19, 1993, this court heard both motions. The sole issue before the court was whether plaintiff fell within a “class” of spouses defined as “insureds” under § 431:10C-103(11)(B) of the Hawaii No-Fault Statute. State Farm…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gump v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
- Robinson v. PlourdeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- I.T. ex rel. Renee T. v. Department of EducationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- Sheehan v. Centex HomesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- World Triathalon Corp. v. DunbarDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.