Legal Opinion
United States Security Warehouse, Inc. v. Tasty Sandwich Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 4, 1967No. 42505PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. Under Sec. 17 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 as amended (Code Ann. § 70-207), it is necessary that an appellant make proper objection to a charge as given or to a request refused and state the grounds therefor, before the jury returns its verdict. This rule is practically identical with Federal Rule 51 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in this respect, so we look to the Federal cases for the purpose of determining the sufficiency of the objections made in the present case. The court failed to give certain numbered re*765quests to charge of the defendant and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Georgia Power Co. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Beaver v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- O'CONNOR v. LudlamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Westchester Fire Insurance Company, and v. William M. Hanley and Lily v. Hanley, AndCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wright v. DilbeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Union Camp Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Golden Peanut Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Jones v. SpindelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Black v. AultmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.