Legal Opinion
Floersheim v. Weinburger
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 29, 1972No. Civ. A. 2048-70PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sydney N. Floersheim, doing business as Floersheim Sales Company and National Research Company, seeks a declaratory judgment that certain forms revised in alleged compliance with an order of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission) are not unfair or deceptive in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 1 15 U.S.C. § 41, et seq. and, therefore, not subject to suppression by the Commission. These forms are sold by the plaintiff to third parties who in turn use them in the collection of delinquent debts and to obtain information…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Genesco Entertainment, a Div. of Lymutt v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. EngmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Geismar v. Abraham & StrausSuffolk County District Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.