Legal Opinion

Russell Stadelman & Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 21, 1999No. Court 96-08-01911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Pogue, Judge:

Plaintiff, Russell Stadelman & Co., challenges a decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) denying Plain tiffs protests filed in accordance with section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (1994). At issue is the proper tariff classification under 19 U.S.C. § 1202 (1994), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), of Plaintiff s imports of sumauma 0Ceibapentandra) plywood, faveira (Parkia spp.) plywood, and mangue (T. rhoisoia) plywood from Brazil.

Plaintiff claims that the subject merchandise is classifiable under…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Russell Stadelman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Timber Products, Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Timber Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  4. Govesan America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  5. Frontier Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API