Legal Opinion
United States v. Kelly
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 9, 1981No. Crim. 80-316-TPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TAURO, District Judge.
The United States Attorney has moved, under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 455(a), that I be disqualified from “conducting any further proceedings in this matter.” Defendant’s motion for Judgment of Acquittal is the only proceeding pending in this case. That motion is based on several grounds, including the allegation that the United States Attorney knowingly used false testimony during the six week extortion trial which ended in a mistrial, after the jury reported five times that it was deadlocked. 1
According to the United States Attorney, his motion was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Henry Francis KelleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- McCuin v. Texas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Martin-Trigona v. LavienDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
- El Fenix De Puerto Rico v. the M/Y JohannyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.