Legal Opinion

Walls v. Gribble

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is a suit to compel the defendants to account to plaintiffs for one-half of the moneys received by the defendants from the sale of a bull which was purchased jointly by plaintiffs and defendants while engaged in a joint enterprise. The bull was purchased in February, 1936, for the sum of $250 from a dealer in New Jersey when the bull was about one year old. The plaintiffs and defendants each paid one-half of the purchase price and one-half of the express charges for shipping the animal to Oregon. The bull was a registered Jersey and is named and designated in the Jersey cattle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
  2. Elliott v. Murphy Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. McKee v. Capitol Dairies, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Russell's Realty, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ghiz v. MillettArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Matanuska Valley Bank, a Corporation v. Irene Arnold and Willard Davis, Individually, and as Copartners, Doing Business as Davis Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API