Legal Opinion

McIver v. Norman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1948Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

Before Lusk, Chief Justice, and Brand, Rossman, Bailey, Hay and Page, Justices.

Former decision adhered to; reversed and remanded.

This is a suit by one of two joint adventurers against the other for dissolution of the joint adventure, an accounting, and other relief. The Circuit Court, in a- memorandum opinion, held that the plaintiff was barred by laches, that “the case falls within the principle of speculative delay”, and entered a decree dismissing the suit. Plaintiff appeals.

On or about September 5,1941, the plaintiff, James W. McIver, and the defendant, William Norman, entered…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Kelley v. BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  5. Allore v. JewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API