Legal Opinion
Ianetta v. Putnam Investments, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 25, 2002No. CIV.A. 00-10385-JLTPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lawrence Ianetta (“Ianetta”) sues Putnam Investments, Inc., alleging sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act Of 1964 (“Title VII”) 1 , and Mass.Gen Laws ch. 151B. Defendant is Putnam Investments, LLC (together with its subsidiary entities, collectively “Putnam”).
Defendant now moves for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Ianetta is a former employee of Putnam Investments. Ianetta began working for Putnam in December 1996 as a shareholder service representative in Boston, Massachusetts. 2 Ianetta’s job en…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martinez v. CONNECTICUT, STATE LIBRARYDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Navarro v. U.S. Tsubaki, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Ayala-Sepulveda v. Municipality of San GermanDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
- Hamm v. Weyauwega Milk Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
- Bellisle v. Landmark Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016