Le Marinel v. Bach
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whitman county, McOroskey, J., entered April 29, 1920, upon finding’s in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— This action was brought for the purpose of enforcing the specific performance of a written contract for the exchange of real estate. The defendants resisted the action, claiming that the contract was not sufficient, and further, that they were induced to enter into it by fraudulent representation. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining the right of the plaintiffs to recover. From this judgment, the defendants appeal.
The respondents are husband and wife and were the owners of a farm consisting of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shelinsky v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Lee v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Leslie v. MathwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Carrick v. MinckeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Huston v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Ellis v. WadleighWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Luther v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Steele v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- South Sound National Bank v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.