Legal Opinion

South Sound National Bank v. Meek

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 19, 1975No. 1324-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This is an action to recover sums allegedly advanced by plaintiff, South Sound National Bank, to MBI Corporation, in reliance on the promises of the defendants, John E. Meek, Robert Bartholet, John Irwin, and their wives, to guarantee loans advanced by plaintiff to the corporation.

The issue framed by the parties is whether RCW 19.36.010, the statute of frauds, precluded plaintiff from attempting to establish by parol evidence terms omitted in the guaranty agreements executed by the defendants. For the reasons stated below, we think the issue presented to both the trial court and this court is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Miller v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Buice v. Scruggs Equipment Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Coleman v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Friedl v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Hite Crane & Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Washington Belt & Drive Systems, Inc. v. Active ErectorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API