Legal Opinion

Huston v. Harrington

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1910No. 8442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered June 17, 1909, in favor of the defendant, after a .trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought by the appellant to enforce specific performance of a written contract. The cause was tried upon its merits. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s action, and awarded an affirmative judgment in favor of the defendant. No findings of fact were made by the trial court. The plaintiff appeals.

The contract is a follows:

“In consideration of fifty ($50) dollars, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, I do agree to sell to R. J. Huston or to whomsoever he may direct, my entire stock, and all my interest in Vashon Investment Co. Inc., at any time within six months from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. Minnesota Tribune Co. v. Associated PressCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Young v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. HONOLULU RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY v. PaschoalHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bovy v. Graham, Cohen & WampoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Lager v. BerggrenWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API