Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Shepard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1995No. 61757-1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

In In re Cashaw, 123 Wn.2d 138, 150, 866 P.2d 8 (1994), we ruled that the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (Board) must "comply with its own regulations for conducting parolability hearings whenever it relies on an inmate’s lack of rehabilitation in setting a minimum term to coincide with the inmate’s maximum term”. We now rule that the Board may not amend its regulations retroactively to deny an inmate the right to appear at a parolability hearing.

Facts

Petitioner Robert Shepard 1 has a long history of committing major crimes and violating parole. On March 10, 1972, the Snohomish County…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Human Rights Commission Hearing TribunalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of LocklearWashington Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API