In Re the Personal Restraint of Shepard
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
In In re Cashaw, 123 Wn.2d 138, 150, 866 P.2d 8 (1994), we ruled that the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (Board) must "comply with its own regulations for conducting parolability hearings whenever it relies on an inmate’s lack of rehabilitation in setting a minimum term to coincide with the inmate’s maximum term”. We now rule that the Board may not amend its regulations retroactively to deny an inmate the right to appear at a parolability hearing.
Facts
Petitioner Robert Shepard 1 has a long history of committing major crimes and violating parole. On March 10, 1972, the Snohomish County…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re the Personal Restraint of MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Human Rights Commission Hearing TribunalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LocklearWashington Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Personal Restraint of GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.