United States v. Lumantes
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD P. MURPHY, District Judge.
This is a denaturalization proceeding against one Amando Sulimenario Lu-mantes. The basis of the government’s case is that Lumantes stated in his preliminary form for petition for naturalization and in his oral examination by the preliminary examiner that he was not then and had never been married. The fact is, and it is admitted by respondent, that at that time and presently Lumantes is married to Angela Munar.
The questions to be decided are two:(1) Is the concealment of marriage a material fact?(2) Has the government proved by the “clear, unequivocal, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. AlbertiniDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1913
- Roberto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- United States v. MarcusDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amando Sulimenario Lumantes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Peter Chaunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Chaunt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. ChandlerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
- Bryant v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.