Legal Opinion

Roberto v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 15, 1932No. 4783PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM-

Appellant was charged in three counts ot an mdictment with having violated section 23 of the Naturalization Act of June 29, 1906 (title 8, § 414, U. S. C. [8 USCA § 414]) in falsely stating on oath, in a naturalization proceeding, that he was a single man. He first pleaded not guilty, but later withdrew the plea and filed successive de-*775irmrrers which were overruled. Thereafter, he again pleaded not gnilty and moved for a bill of particulars and then withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a. plea of guilty as to counts 1 and 2. The court entered a nolle prosequi as to the third…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BayaudU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
  2. United States v. MarcusDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. Bergen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. State v. DeutschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  5. Peel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API