Legal Opinion

Amando Sulimenario Lumantes v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1956No. 14826_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1451, revoking the naturalization of appellant.

It is conceded that appellant falsely misrepresented his marital status throughout the naturalization proceedings, but appellant denies that the misrepresentation was “willful” within the meaning of the statute.

After hearing appellant testify, viewing his demeanor and manner, and judging his credibility in the light of all the evidence, the trial court found inter alia that appellant “wilfully misrepresented his marital status with knowledge of the falsity and intent to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knauer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. LumantesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peter Chaunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Chaunt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. ChandlerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  4. United States v. Domenico D'Agostino A/K/A Domenick D'agostino, A/K/A Domenick Dagostino, Niagara Falls, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Chaunt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API