Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ginocchio v. Shaughnessy

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1923No. 2611PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sanders, J.:

On the 7th day of June, 1923, the Public Service Commission of Nevada refused to receive and act upon an application, duly filed, of Ginocchio Bros, for a certificate of public convenience to operate an auto, freight transportation service between Carson City, in Ormsby County, and the town of Minden, in Douglas County, and points on Lake Tahoe, in Nevada, and all intermediate points. Ginocchio Bros., upon the refusal of the commission to receive and act upon their said application, petitioned this court for a writ of mandate to compel it so to do. But a single…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  2. Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. SlocumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Cooper, Myers & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Redman v. KyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sheriff, Clark County v. LuqmanNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Solberg v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. McLaughlin v. Housing Authority of City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Western Realty Co. v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Moses v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API