Legal Opinion

Hennick v. Schwans Sales Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided October 3, 2001No. C 00-3024-MWBPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION.941

II.LEGAL ANALYSIS.943

A. Standards For Summary Judgment.943

1. Requirements of Rule 56 .943

2. The parties’ burdens.943

3. Summary judgment in employment discrimination cases.944

B. Hennick’s Pay Discrimination Claim.945

1. The prima facie case.946

a. “Equal work”.946

b. Unequal pay and the scope of comparison.947

i. The Sowell rule.947

ii. The Hutchins rule .947

iii. The appropriate rule.949

2. Hennick’s prima facie case.950

C. Discriminatory Failure To Hire, Train, Or…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lorenzen v. GKN Armstrong Wheels, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
  2. Wensel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
  3. Woods v. Salisbury Behavioral Health, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Wachter-Young v. Ohio Casualty GroupDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  5. Fagen v. IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API