Legal Opinion
Wachter-Young v. Ohio Casualty Group
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 14, 2002No. CV 01-3011-AAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, Judge.
Plaintiff, Karen Wachter-Young, brings this action for civil damages under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e and the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) for wage discrimination. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss plaintiffs complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion is granted.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Plaintiff began working for defendant, Ohio Casualty Insurance Corporation (OCIC), as a Senior Claims Representative on December 1, 1998. Plaintiffs Memo, p. 1; Defendants’ Facts, p. 2.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allender v. UNIVERSITY OF PORTLANDDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Freyd v. Univ. of Or.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Black v. Barrett Business Services, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2019
- Gleason v. Filter Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024