Legal Opinion

Enos v. Walter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1960No. Appeal, No. 239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Weight, J.,

We are here concerned with the interpretation and application of several sections of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 The question before us is whether a petition filed by claimant on May 12, 1958, is to be considered as an original claim petition, and therefore barred by the sixteen month time limitation in Section 315, or whether it may be considered as a petition for review and reinstatement of an agreement, and therefore timely under the two year limitation in Section *55413. Adopting the latter view, the Referee made an award, but suspended payments thereunder so long “as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wahs v. Wolf (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Blair, Jr. v. LaugheadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Busch v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Pooler v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bigley v. Unity Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. SKF USA, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Bigley v. Unity Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API