Pooler v. Grasselli Chemical Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Kenworthey, J.,
Opinion by
This appeal is an attempt to persuade us that our previous decision (142 Pa. Superior Ct. 553, 16 A. (2d) 655) was wrong and that we should overrule it.
The controlling question is whether a workmen’s compensation agreement executed less than ten days after the accident in violation of Sec. 407 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law . of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 1 is void where the employer recognized the validity of the agreement by making payments under it for a period of six months. We said at p. 555: “We are of the opinion that the defendant, as it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Furman v. Standard P. Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. DalySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Pooler v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duddy v. Conshohocken Printing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- C & E Trucking Corp. v. LuisserCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Enos v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. Zeidenstein, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1952