Martin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PAPADAKOS, Justice.
On June 2, 1989, Thomas R. Martin, Appellant, injured his lower back during the course of his employment with Emmaus Bakery, Appellee. Appellant was totally disabled due to the injury which was diagnosed as a possible disc herniation, the type of injury which is routinely treated by chiropractic manipulation and physiotherapy. Appellant immediately began chiropractic treatment with Dr. Gary Tarola, a Board certified specialist in chiropractic orthopedics. As a result of the *444chiropractic treatment and physiotherapy, Appellant was able to return to work on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- St. Joe Container Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Martin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ramich v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Thomeier v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Ritter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- 700 Pharm. v. Bur of WC (State Workers' Ins. Fund)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.