Legal Opinion
Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 3, 1977No. 46PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANDERINO, Justice.
Section 306(f) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 531, provides for payment by the employer for “. . . reasonable surgical and medical services, services provided by duly licensed practitioners of the healing arts, medicines, and supplies, . . . ” made necessary by a work related injury to an employee. On November 17, 1972, while in the employ of appellee, Overmyer Mold Company, appellant, William H. Collier, suffered a work-related injury to his lower back. Following his injury, appellant consulted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Dupree v. BarneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Billick v. Republic Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Chernetsky v. William Penn Stripping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Cope v. Philadelphia Toilet Laundry & Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Lash v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Rettinger v. American Can Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Hilton Hotel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.