Legal Opinion

Martin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELTON, Senior Judge.

Thomas R. Martin (Claimant) petitions for review of the September 17, 1992 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the Referee’s decision denying reimbursement to Claimant for chiropractic services which Claimant received during the first fourteen days after he suffered a work-related injury.1 We affirm.2

Claimant presents the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co., 473 Pa. 369, 374 A.2d 689 (1977) authorizes an injured employee to obtain and be reimbursed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Czap v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Dupree v. BarneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. ACF Industries, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Martin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API