Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 2, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-1494Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERNEST HUNTER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-1494 (CKK) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. Memorandum Opinion (September 2, 2020) Ernest Hunter (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, was an employee of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) from May 20, 2013 through the time of his termination, on October 14, 2017. Plaintiff filed suit against WMATA under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging claims of gender discrimination and retaliation. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.