Legal Opinion

Webb v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1921No. 1720PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

Appellants, Geo. T. Webb and others, brought this suit against the appellee, Emmerson-Brantingham Implement Company, to recover damages for fraudulent representations made by the implement company in the sale of a secondhand gasoline tractor. This appeal is from the judgment of the trial court, sustaining defendant’s general and special exceptions to the plaintiffs’ petition. We will therefore set out so much of the allegations of this pleading as is necessary to make our holding in reference thereto intelligible.

Plaintiffs alleged: First. That in November, 1916, the implement company…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ArnoldTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. West Florida Land Co. v. StudebakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1929
  4. E. F. Elmberg Co. v. Dunlap Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. B. & H. Motor Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API