Legal Opinion
Davison v. City of Tucson
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 13, 1996No. CIV 96-151 TUC WDBPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM D. BROWNING, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ March 8, 1996 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. 1 The Court having reviewed the parties’ briefs and oral arguments, the motion is denied.
Findings of Fact
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), the Court relies on the following undisputed facts. 2 An encampment of homeless persons exists at the base of A-Mountain in Tucson, Arizona. Some or all of the named plaintiffs in this action live in the encampment. Located entirely on city-owned property, the encampment has existed at the base of A-Mountain for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James S. Joel v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Agnes J. Martinez v. Lane S. Wolfenbarger, in his individual capacity; Paul D. Mullenax, in his individual capacity; and Salt Lake City, a municipal corporationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
- JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.