Legal Opinion

James S. Joel v. City of Orlando

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 28, 2000No. 99-14535PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARNES, Circuit Judge:

James Joel, a homeless person, was arrested by City of Orlando (“City”) police officers for violating Section 43.52 of the City’s Code. That provision prohibits “camping” on public property, which is defined to include, among other things, “sleeping out-of-doors.” Joel filed a complaint in the district court claiming that Section 43.52 violates his rights under the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City and Joel appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  2. National Parks Conservation Association, Tropical Audubon Society v. Gail Norton, Fran P. ManellaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Robert Martin v. City of BoiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  5. Manning v. Caldwell for City of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API