Legal Opinion
In Re Crichlow
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 16, 2004No. 19-40385PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY
WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
The matter before the Court is whether Marie Maud Crichlow (the “Debtor”) retains a post-foreclosure interest in real property such that she can cure a default under 11 U.S.C. § 1322(c)(1). Sandra Da-Silva (“DaSilva”), the high bidder at the foreclosure auction, filed a motion for relief seeking authority to evict the Debtor. The Debtor objected arguing that she is entitled to cure her default and maintain possession of the premises. For the reasons set forth below, I will enter…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Norma I. Colon, Debtor-Appellant v. Option One Mortgage Corporation, And/or Its AssignsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Williams v. Resolution GGF OyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- TD Bank, N.A. v. LaPointeBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2014
- In re RichterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Bailey v. Wells Fargo Bank, NAUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- In Re BaileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- In Re MellinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.