Frankovis v. Klug & Smith Co.

Appellants contend that material findings of the jury are without support in the evidence and that defendants were therefore entitled to a directed verdict and dismissal of the complaint. In the alternative they assert errors requiring a new trial.

1. It is first argued that there is no evidence to support the finding that the clamp end of the angle iron was not adequately tightened; and reliance is placed on evidence that the sole purpose of the angle irons was to support the weight of light fixtures suspended from them vertically, and not to resist lateral pressures.

There was other evidence…