Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.
The Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Company contends that it is not subject to the penalty provided in sec. 102.57 or sec. 101.06, Stats., the so-called safe-place statute, for a condition which it did not create, over which it had no control, which it had no authority to alter, change, or correct, of which it had no knowledge or reason to suspect or believe existed after due inspection of the premises before permitting its workmen to work thereon, and for which it could not have been subjected to a forfeiture under sec. 101.28.
It does not attack the validity of Safety Order No. 3523 or the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neitzke v. Kraft-Phenix Dairies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Williams v. International Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Saxhaug v. Forsyth Leather Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Wannmacher v. Baldauf Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Frankovis v. Klug & Smith Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Wasley v. KosmatkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Hofflander v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Wittka v. HartnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Gennrich v. Zurich American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.