Legal Opinion

Heath v. Kresky Manufacturing Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1955No. 521PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendant Kresky Manufacturing Company, Inc., excepted to the action of the court (1) in refusing to find facts as requested, (2) in finding facts as heretofore set out, and (3) in entering judgment holding the service of process valid. The exceptions neither point out which of the findings made, or refused, are objected to, nor designate what the objection is. Such exceptions, therefore, are insufficient to bring up for review either the findings of fact or the evidence upon which they are based. Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N.C. 537, 35 S.E. 2d 609; Efird v. Smith, 208 N.C. 394, 180 S.E.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Wilson v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Whitehurst v. . KerrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. In Re Will of BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Lambert v. SchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Prime South Homes, Inc. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Merrell v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Hope Dale Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Harrington v. Croft Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. CAROLINA PAPER COMPANY, INC. v. BouchelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API