Legal Opinion

People v. Crittle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1973No. 13 April Term 1973, Docket No. 53,939PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

What constitutes a proper jury instruction relative to intoxication where an element of the crime is the existence of a specific intent is the substantial issue in this case.

I —FACTS

The defendant was involved in a parking accident and seemed to the driver of the bumped car to be intoxicated, slurring his words etc. when they exchanged information. Immediately thereafter defendant entered a grocery store, pointed a gun at a cashier, saying "This is a hold up”. The cashier recognized defendant as a customer of two or three months. The cashier asked if he was serious and he said yes. After she…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. GuillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Roberts v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. People v. DorrikasMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. HearnMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. KelleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. People v. JollyMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. LangworthyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API