Legal Opinion

Miller Chevrolet Co. v. Sears

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 5, 1954No. 19PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChase, J.

This is an action of tort for damages to the plaintiff’s automobile. Trial was had by jury. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff. The case is here on the defendant’s bill of exceptions.

At the close of all the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict and after the verdict the defendant moved to set aside the verdict and for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. These motions were denied and exceptions allowed. The grounds of these motions were that on all the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to-the plaintiff, it was.guilty of contributory negligence, as a matter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huestis v. Estate of LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  2. Bressett v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  3. Hastings v. SouleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
  4. Kennedy v. LarameeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Forcier v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  2. Smith v. GroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  3. Betty L. Harrington, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Socinski v. Benjamin SharffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Desrocher v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  5. Overocker v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API