Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Soule

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 3, 1953No. 1814PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, C. J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries and damages to his automobile received in an accident alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant. The cause comes here upon the plaintiff’s exceptions after a verdict and judgment for the defendant.

The exceptions relied upon are to the court’s charge and to the denial of plaintiff’s motions for a directed verdict and to set the verdict aside, .and as briefed are all based upon the grounds that the evidence, when viewed most favorably to the defendant, shows as a matter of law that the defendant was guilty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. StringerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  2. Bressett v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  3. Farrell v. GreeneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  4. Colburn v. FrostSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  5. Frenier v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. GroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  2. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Campbell v. BeedeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  4. Scrizzi v. BarawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  5. Welch v. StowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API