In Re Guardianship of Dawson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s order voiding a deed on the grounds of grantor’s incompetence. Respondent guardian moves to strike ward’s brief. We affirm, and deny the motion to strike.
FACTS
In September 1989, Cleon Dawson signed a deed prepared by his niece, appellant Helen Nickens, which purported to transfer title to Dawson’s house to Nickens, while reserving a life estate for Dawson. Dawson signed the deed in front of four witnesses, but the deed was not notarized. At the time he signed the deed, Dawson was a patient in a nursing home. Nickens was homeless,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gjovik v. StropeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Agassiz & Odessa Mutual Fire Insurance v. MagnussonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Krueger v. ZochSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State Bank of Cologne v. SchruppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Inman v. InmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carlson Real Estate Co. v. SoltanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 14 v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- S.B. Foot Tanning Co. v. PiotrowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Riley on Behalf of Swanson v. HerbesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.