Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Dawson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1993No. C1-93-234PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s order voiding a deed on the grounds of grantor’s incompetence. Respondent guardian moves to strike ward’s brief. We affirm, and deny the motion to strike.

FACTS

In September 1989, Cleon Dawson signed a deed prepared by his niece, appellant Helen Nickens, which purported to transfer title to Dawson’s house to Nickens, while reserving a life estate for Dawson. Dawson signed the deed in front of four witnesses, but the deed was not notarized. At the time he signed the deed, Dawson was a patient in a nursing home. Nickens was homeless,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gjovik v. StropeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Agassiz & Odessa Mutual Fire Insurance v. MagnussonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Krueger v. ZochSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. State Bank of Cologne v. SchruppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Inman v. InmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carlson Real Estate Co. v. SoltanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 14 v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. S.B. Foot Tanning Co. v. PiotrowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Riley on Behalf of Swanson v. HerbesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API