Legal Opinion

Carlson Real Estate Co. v. Soltan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1996No. C4-95-1754PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant argues that the trial court erred by ordering restitution in favor of respondent landlord. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Mahmoud Soltan leased from respondent Carlson Real Estate Company (Carlson) two retail spaces — a convenience store and a gift store — in the skyway of the Plaza VII building in Minneapolis. Section 5.5(a) of the written lease required Soltan to

[ejonduct and remain open for business in the Premises in good faith and in a reputable manner during the [term of the lease and during specified hours].

The Radisson Hotel kitchen is located directly above…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Gjovik v. StropeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fortune Funding, Llc, a Florida Limited Liability Company v. Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Stacey v. RedfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Opus Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. International Business MacHines Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Charles Pearson v. Rohn Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API