Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 2000No. Petition No. 384 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*553 ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether the WCAB and the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the termination of petitioner’s disability benefits because the WCJ failed to adequately explain on the record why she rejected conflicting, competent medical evidence pursuant to section 422(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act?

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. CPV Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Reinert v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. CPV Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Sewell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001