Legal Opinion

Plante v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 4, 1989No. 87-585PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Defendant Johnson, a driver in an automobile negligence action, appeals from denial of her motion in arrest of a consolidated judgment in plaintiff’s favor against both her and Cheers, Inc., a defendant sued under Vermont’s Dram Shop Act, 7 V.S.A. § 501 et seq. We affirm.

Plaintiff was injured when she was involved in an automobile accident with defendant. She sued defendant as the driver of the other car and in a separate action sued Cheers, Inc. and a second tavern under the Dram Shop Act, alleging liability for the same injuries resulting from the accident. Plaintiff moved under V.R.C.P.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Howard v. SpaffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. Winney v. Ransom & Hastings, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Smith v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Swett v. Haig's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Reeves v. GentileUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Levine v. WyethSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. Annecharico v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API