Legal Opinion

Levine v. Wyeth

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 18, 2008No. 2004-384PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶ 1. Defendant Wyeth, a drug manufacturer, appeals from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Diana Levine, who suffered severe injury and the amputation of her arm as a result of being injected with defendant’s drug Phenergan. Plaintiff claimed at trial that defendant was negligent and failed to provide adequate warnings of the known dangers of injecting Phenergan directly into a patient’s vein. Defendant argues that the trial court should not have allowed the jury to consider plaintiff’s claims because the claims conflict with defendant’s obligations under federal law regulating prescription…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Green Valley Special Util Dist v. Donna Nelson, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. Colacicco v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. McDarby v. Merck & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API