Legal Opinion

Winney v. Ransom & Hastings, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1988No. 85-031PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the granting of defendants’ motions to dismiss by the Windham Superior Court, pursuant to V.R.A.P. 5(b). Two issues are presented for our review: first, whether the remedy provided by Vermont’s Dram Shop Act, 7 V.S.A. § 501, precludes a common law action for the negligent sale or furnishing of intoxicating liquor and second, whether such a common law action exists. We affirm.

For purposes of this appeal, we must assume as true all of the facts alleged by plaintiff in his amended complaint, and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Kowal v. HofherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Mason v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Berkeley v. ParkNew York Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bonnie Sargent v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Thayer v. HerdtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. Swett v. Haig's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Rodrigue v. VALCO Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API