Legal Opinion
Amperse v. Winslow
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1889PublishedCited by 29 opinions
Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Case for refusal to approve of a liquor bond. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The defendant interposed a demurrer to the declaration filed in this cause that it did not state a cause of action, and had a judgment thereon.
Plaintiff brings the case into this Court. The declaration is as follows:
“ Catharine Ampersé, the plaintiff in this case, by O. T. Tuthill, her attorney, complains of G-eorge O. Winslow, the defendant, who has been summoned to answer the said plaintiff in an action of trespass on the case.
“For that whereas, the plaintiff is a resident and a citizen of the city of Kalamazoo, State of Michigan, and has been continually therein for ten years and upwards,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wall v. TrumbullMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Albin v. Board of Directors of the Independent DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Pfister v. State ex rel. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Supervisor & Overseers of the Poor v. Supervisor & Overseers of the PoorNew York Supreme Court · 1824
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Christian Kreipke v. Wayne State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Bruce v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Alice P. Nelson, Administratrix of the Estate of Ronald Nelson, Deceased v. David R. Knox, Robert C. AkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.