Legal Opinion

Wolfson v. Board of Rubicon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus to compel respondent to approve a liquor bond. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Relator complained of the respondent for arbitrarily rejecting one of the sureties to his liquor bond. On presenting the bond, which was required to be in the sum of $5,500, one of the sureties was accepted, and one, named Weiss, rejected. Weiss gave a schedule of his property, with his own valuation on it. He appears to be a farmer, *50occupying or owning four forty-acre iots, which he valued at sums aggregating $7,500. He also valued his personalty at a little over $1,100. This consisted of wheat on the ground, farm implements, horses, and cattle. His debts he put at $700. , .

It appeared by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Potter v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Post v. Township Board of SpartaMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Bailey v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Divine v. Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Farr v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API