State v. Hill

After a jury trial the defendant was found guilty of arson murder in violation of General Statutes § ¡SSa-Md.1 Thereafter, in accordance with the provisions of that statute, the trial judge sentenced the defendant to a term of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole.2 In his appeal from that judgment the *669defendant claims that: (1) the trial court unduly restricted his voir dire examination of the individual jurors; (2) the trial court erred in refusing to permit evidence of another’s motive to commit the arson; (3) the arson murder statute violates his right to due process; and (4)…