Legal Opinion

West v. Lysle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1930No. Appeal, 201PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

On this appeal, the executive officers and councilmen of the City of McKeesport ask us to reverse a final decree of the court below, enjoining them “from repairing and repaving the streets and highways in the City of McKeesport, unless contracts are awarded after due advertisement in the manner provided by article IV, section 5 of the Act of Assembly of 1913, P. L. 568, as amended by the Act of 1919, P. L. 310. The said municipality shall have the right to make ordinary repairs to said streets and highways without advertisement or without letting to the lowest…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kates's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Orth & Bro. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. McFadden v. Lineweaver Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Sheetz v. Hanbest's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Heaney v. Mauch Chunk Boro. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. Hubbs (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Howell v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  5. Reinbold v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API